An empirical comparison of meta analysis models for continuous data with missing standard deviations
Abstract: The choice between the Fixed and Random Effects models for providing an overall meta analysis estimates may affect the accuracy of those estimates. When the study-level standard deviations (SDs) are not completely reported or are “missing” selection of a meta analysis model should be done...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, Saidin, Norraida |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
InterStat (Virginia Tech)
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/5544/1/1105002.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/5544/ http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2011/abstracts/1105002.php |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The effects of the choice of meta analysis model on the overall estimates for continuous data with missing standard deviations
by: Nik Ruzni, Nik Idris, et al.
Published: (2010) -
The effects of imputing the missing standard deviations on the standard error of meta analysis estimates
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2009) -
An empirical study of the choice of meta analysis model on the overall estimates for continuous data with missing standard deviations
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2010) -
An empirical study of the choice of meta analysis model on the overall estimates for continuous data with missing standard deviations
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Missing variability in meta-analysis : is imputing always good?
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2006)