Staff View: Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected

Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected

The aims of this study were to identify the retrieval features for online databases; difficulties faced by users; and retrieval features expected by users. A total of 25 databases were surveyed and 40 users were interviewed after the training sessions. Common retrieval features included Boolean oper...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Othman, Roslina, Halim, Nor Sahlawaty
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2004
Subjects:	T Technology (General) TK7885 Computer engineering Z665 Library Science. Information Science
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/31442/1/Retrieval_features_for.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/31442/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520410543643
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my.iium.irep.31442
record_format	dspace
spelling	my.iium.irep.314422022-08-11T00:38:16Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/31442/ Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected Othman, Roslina Halim, Nor Sahlawaty T Technology (General) TK7885 Computer engineering Z665 Library Science. Information Science The aims of this study were to identify the retrieval features for online databases; difficulties faced by users; and retrieval features expected by users. A total of 25 databases were surveyed and 40 users were interviewed after the training sessions. Common retrieval features included Boolean operators,phrase searching, match of exact words or phrases, field specific and limit fields searches, truncation, and wildcard. Even though features are offered in many systems, their interpretation andimplementation are different. Unique features included lateral searching, density and frequency of terms, reference link, and searching via table of content. The expected features includedrelevance feedback and term weighting other than those already offered by ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore. Such expectations were influenced by the users’ background in ICT. Difficulties included application of the retrieval features in searching. Database providers must include the expected features, synonyms linked to terms in the thesaurus, and extensive search examples. Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2004-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/31442/1/Retrieval_features_for.pdf Othman, Roslina and Halim, Nor Sahlawaty (2004) Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected. Online Information Review, 28 (3). pp. 200-210. ISSN 1468-4527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520410543643 doi:10.1108/14684520410543643
institution	Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building	IIUM Library
collection	Institutional Repository
continent	Asia
country	Malaysia
content_provider	International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source	IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider	http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language	English
topic	T Technology (General) TK7885 Computer engineering Z665 Library Science. Information Science
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) TK7885 Computer engineering Z665 Library Science. Information Science Othman, Roslina Halim, Nor Sahlawaty Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
description	The aims of this study were to identify the retrieval features for online databases; difficulties faced by users; and retrieval features expected by users. A total of 25 databases were surveyed and 40 users were interviewed after the training sessions. Common retrieval features included Boolean operators,phrase searching, match of exact words or phrases, field specific and limit fields searches, truncation, and wildcard. Even though features are offered in many systems, their interpretation andimplementation are different. Unique features included lateral searching, density and frequency of terms, reference link, and searching via table of content. The expected features includedrelevance feedback and term weighting other than those already offered by ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore. Such expectations were influenced by the users’ background in ICT. Difficulties included application of the retrieval features in searching. Database providers must include the expected features, synonyms linked to terms in the thesaurus, and extensive search examples.
format	Article
author	Othman, Roslina Halim, Nor Sahlawaty
author_facet	Othman, Roslina Halim, Nor Sahlawaty
author_sort	Othman, Roslina
title	Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
title_short	Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
title_full	Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
title_fullStr	Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
title_full_unstemmed	Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
title_sort	retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected
publisher	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
publishDate	2004
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/31442/1/Retrieval_features_for.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/31442/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520410543643
_version_	1743106823181828096
score	13.211869

Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected

Similar Items