Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility

Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access router to another. As a demand for wireless mobile devices increases, many enhancements for macro-mobility (inter-domain) protocols have been proposed, designed and implemented in Mobile IPv6. Hierarchic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha, Rusli, Nazreen, Ridzuan, Fauzana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (W A S E T) 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/31095/1/Evaluation_of_handover.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/31095/
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.193.4527&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.31095
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.310952020-12-08T05:56:05Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/31095/ Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha Rusli, Nazreen Ridzuan, Fauzana T Technology (General) TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access router to another. As a demand for wireless mobile devices increases, many enhancements for macro-mobility (inter-domain) protocols have been proposed, designed and implemented in Mobile IPv6. Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) is one of them that is designed to reduce the amount of signaling required and to improve handover speed for mobile connections. This is achieved by introducing a new network entity called Mobility Anchor Point (MAP). This report presents a comparative study of the Hierarchical Mobility IPv6 and Mobile IPv6 protocols and we have narrowed down the scope to micro-mobility (intra-domain). The architecture and operation of each protocol is studied and they are evaluated based on the Quality of Service (QoS) parameter; handover latency. The simulation was carried out by using the Network Simulator-2. The outcome from this simulation has been discussed. From the results, it shows that, HMIPv6 performs best under intra-domain mobility compared to MIPv6. The MIPv6 suffers large handover latency. As enhancement we proposed to HMIPv6 to locate the MAP to be in the middle of the domain with respect to all Access Routers. That gives approximately same distance between MAP and Mobile Node (MN) regardless of the new location of MN, and possible shorter distance. This will reduce the delay since the distance is shorter. As a future work performance analysis is to be carried for the proposed HMIPv6 and compared to HMIPv6. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (W A S E T) 2005 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/31095/1/Evaluation_of_handover.pdf Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha and Rusli, Nazreen and Ridzuan, Fauzana (2005) Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 11. pp. 260-262. ISSN 1307-6884 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.193.4527&rep=rep1&type=pdf
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha
Rusli, Nazreen
Ridzuan, Fauzana
Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
description Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access router to another. As a demand for wireless mobile devices increases, many enhancements for macro-mobility (inter-domain) protocols have been proposed, designed and implemented in Mobile IPv6. Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) is one of them that is designed to reduce the amount of signaling required and to improve handover speed for mobile connections. This is achieved by introducing a new network entity called Mobility Anchor Point (MAP). This report presents a comparative study of the Hierarchical Mobility IPv6 and Mobile IPv6 protocols and we have narrowed down the scope to micro-mobility (intra-domain). The architecture and operation of each protocol is studied and they are evaluated based on the Quality of Service (QoS) parameter; handover latency. The simulation was carried out by using the Network Simulator-2. The outcome from this simulation has been discussed. From the results, it shows that, HMIPv6 performs best under intra-domain mobility compared to MIPv6. The MIPv6 suffers large handover latency. As enhancement we proposed to HMIPv6 to locate the MAP to be in the middle of the domain with respect to all Access Routers. That gives approximately same distance between MAP and Mobile Node (MN) regardless of the new location of MN, and possible shorter distance. This will reduce the delay since the distance is shorter. As a future work performance analysis is to be carried for the proposed HMIPv6 and compared to HMIPv6.
format Article
author Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha
Rusli, Nazreen
Ridzuan, Fauzana
author_facet Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha
Rusli, Nazreen
Ridzuan, Fauzana
author_sort Hassan Abdalla Hashim, Aisha
title Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
title_short Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
title_full Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
title_fullStr Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
title_sort evaluation of handover latency in intra-domain mobility
publisher World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (W A S E T)
publishDate 2005
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/31095/1/Evaluation_of_handover.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/31095/
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.193.4527&rep=rep1&type=pdf
_version_ 1685578515742720000
score 13.211869