A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction
Solar power prediction is crucial for integrating renewable energy into the grid, but current methods often struggle with accuracy due to the limitations of machine learning algorithms. This study aims to enhance prediction accuracy by comparing the performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Proceeding Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/115179/13/115179_%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20LSTM.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/115179/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10675536 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA62563.2024.10675536 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.iium.irep.115179 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.1151792024-10-22T04:28:04Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/115179/ A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction M. Helmy, Muhammad Fareezy Fahmy Yusoff, Siti Hajar Mansor, Hasmah Gunawan, Teddy Surya Chowdhury, Israth Jahan Mohd Sapihie, Siti Nadiah TK1001 Production of electric energy. Powerplants TK3001 Distribution or transmission of electric power. The electric power circuit Solar power prediction is crucial for integrating renewable energy into the grid, but current methods often struggle with accuracy due to the limitations of machine learning algorithms. This study aims to enhance prediction accuracy by comparing the performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models using datasets from Hebei, China. The main objective is identifying the most effective algorithm for precise solar power forecasting. The methodology involves training both models on historical solar power data and evaluating their performance against the Graph Spatial-Temporal Attention Neural Network (GSTANN) benchmark. The SVM model was selected for its superior metrics, achieving an MAE (Mean Absolute Error) of 0.5587, RMSE of 0.9741, and a training time of 0.0157 seconds. Results show that SVM outperforms GSTANN in 45 and 60- minute intervals, with MAE, MAPE, and RMSE improvements of up to 68.62%, 42.65%, and 69.44%, respectively. These findings suggest that SVM offers a more reliable solution for solar power prediction, providing valuable insights for further model enhancements. IEEE 2024-09-18 Proceeding Paper PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/115179/13/115179_%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20LSTM.pdf M. Helmy, Muhammad Fareezy Fahmy and Yusoff, Siti Hajar and Mansor, Hasmah and Gunawan, Teddy Surya and Chowdhury, Israth Jahan and Mohd Sapihie, Siti Nadiah (2024) A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications, 30-31 July 2024, Bandung, Indonesia. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10675536 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA62563.2024.10675536 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TK1001 Production of electric energy. Powerplants TK3001 Distribution or transmission of electric power. The electric power circuit |
spellingShingle |
TK1001 Production of electric energy. Powerplants TK3001 Distribution or transmission of electric power. The electric power circuit M. Helmy, Muhammad Fareezy Fahmy Yusoff, Siti Hajar Mansor, Hasmah Gunawan, Teddy Surya Chowdhury, Israth Jahan Mohd Sapihie, Siti Nadiah A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction |
description |
Solar power prediction is crucial for integrating
renewable energy into the grid, but current methods often
struggle with accuracy due to the limitations of machine
learning algorithms. This study aims to enhance prediction
accuracy by comparing the performance of Long Short-Term
Memory (LSTM) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models
using datasets from Hebei, China. The main objective is
identifying the most effective algorithm for precise solar power forecasting. The methodology involves training both models on historical solar power data and evaluating their performance against the Graph Spatial-Temporal Attention Neural Network (GSTANN) benchmark. The SVM model was selected for its superior metrics, achieving an MAE (Mean Absolute Error) of 0.5587, RMSE of 0.9741, and a training time of 0.0157 seconds.
Results show that SVM outperforms GSTANN in 45 and 60-
minute intervals, with MAE, MAPE, and RMSE improvements
of up to 68.62%, 42.65%, and 69.44%, respectively. These
findings suggest that SVM offers a more reliable solution for
solar power prediction, providing valuable insights for further
model enhancements. |
format |
Proceeding Paper |
author |
M. Helmy, Muhammad Fareezy Fahmy Yusoff, Siti Hajar Mansor, Hasmah Gunawan, Teddy Surya Chowdhury, Israth Jahan Mohd Sapihie, Siti Nadiah |
author_facet |
M. Helmy, Muhammad Fareezy Fahmy Yusoff, Siti Hajar Mansor, Hasmah Gunawan, Teddy Surya Chowdhury, Israth Jahan Mohd Sapihie, Siti Nadiah |
author_sort |
M. Helmy, Muhammad Fareezy Fahmy |
title |
A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction |
title_short |
A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction |
title_full |
A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction |
title_fullStr |
A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative analysis of LSTM, SVM, and GSTANN models for enhancing solar power prediction |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of lstm, svm, and gstann models for enhancing solar power prediction |
publisher |
IEEE |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/115179/13/115179_%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20LSTM.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/115179/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10675536 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA62563.2024.10675536 |
_version_ |
1814042756956291072 |
score |
13.211869 |