Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements
Different clinical equipment may use different methods to assess cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and arteriolar-to-venular diameter ratio (AVR) that may result in different readings. This study was conducted to compare the CDR and AVR measurements between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photog...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IIUM
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/100699/1/100699_Comparison%20between%20OCT.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/100699/ https://journals.iium.edu.my/ktn/index.php/ijohs |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.iium.irep.100699 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.1006992022-10-19T01:54:25Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/100699/ Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements Othman, Shah Farez Ho, Kang Guan RE Ophthalmology Different clinical equipment may use different methods to assess cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and arteriolar-to-venular diameter ratio (AVR) that may result in different readings. This study was conducted to compare the CDR and AVR measurements between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photography (FP). Thirty-four (34) subjects were recruited into this clinical cross-sectional study. The mean aged of subjects was 22.90 ± 1.33 years, ranging from 21 to 27 years. Whereas the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.04 ± 2.42 D, ranging from +0.25 to -9.25 D. For the OCT, a 3D Optic Disc Scan protocol was used to measure CDR and AVR. Whereas a planimetry technique was used to obtain CDR and AVR measurements from the FP image output. The mean CDR and AVR obtained from OCT were 0.51 ± 0.08 and 0.74 ± 0.06, respectively. Whereas, the mean CDR and AVR obtained from FP were 0.41± 0.05 and 0.64 ± 0.05, respectively. There were statistical significant differences in the mean CDR and AVR between OCT [t(33) = 7.21, p<0.01] and FP [t(33) = 11.25, p<0.01] measurements. The CDR and AVR from OCT measurement were higher compared to the FP. In conclusion, during a routine clinical measurement for CDR and AVR, the various clinical equipment used must be taken into consideration before making a clinical diagnosis. IIUM 2021-11-24 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/100699/1/100699_Comparison%20between%20OCT.pdf Othman, Shah Farez and Ho, Kang Guan (2021) Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements. In: IIUM Research Day 2021: An International Online Event for Life Sciences, 24 Nov 2021, IIUM, Kuantan Campus. https://journals.iium.edu.my/ktn/index.php/ijohs 10.31436/ijohs.v3iSupplement 1 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
RE Ophthalmology |
spellingShingle |
RE Ophthalmology Othman, Shah Farez Ho, Kang Guan Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements |
description |
Different clinical equipment may use different methods to assess cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and arteriolar-to-venular diameter ratio (AVR) that may result in different readings. This study was conducted to compare the CDR and AVR measurements between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photography (FP). Thirty-four (34) subjects were recruited into this clinical cross-sectional study. The mean aged of subjects was 22.90 ± 1.33 years, ranging from 21 to 27 years. Whereas the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.04 ± 2.42 D, ranging from +0.25 to -9.25 D. For the OCT, a 3D Optic Disc Scan protocol was used to measure CDR and AVR. Whereas a planimetry technique was used to obtain CDR and AVR measurements from the FP image output. The mean CDR and AVR obtained from OCT were 0.51 ± 0.08 and 0.74 ± 0.06, respectively. Whereas, the mean CDR and AVR obtained from FP were 0.41± 0.05 and 0.64 ± 0.05, respectively. There were statistical significant differences in the mean CDR and AVR between OCT [t(33) = 7.21, p<0.01] and FP [t(33) = 11.25, p<0.01] measurements. The CDR and AVR from OCT measurement were higher compared to the FP. In conclusion, during a routine clinical measurement for CDR and AVR, the various clinical equipment used must be taken into consideration before making a clinical diagnosis. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Othman, Shah Farez Ho, Kang Guan |
author_facet |
Othman, Shah Farez Ho, Kang Guan |
author_sort |
Othman, Shah Farez |
title |
Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements |
title_short |
Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements |
title_full |
Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between OCT and Fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and Arteriolar-to-Venular ratio measurements |
title_sort |
comparison between oct and fundus photography on cup-to-disc ratio and arteriolar-to-venular ratio measurements |
publisher |
IIUM |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/100699/1/100699_Comparison%20between%20OCT.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/100699/ https://journals.iium.edu.my/ktn/index.php/ijohs |
_version_ |
1748180274693275648 |
score |
13.211869 |