Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection

In most cases, retrograde gas reservoir in N Field which is located at the north of Malay Basin achieved 40-70% of recovery factor (RF) compared to dry gas reservoir, 80-90% of RF. Reservoir K, a lean retrograde gas reservoir of the N Field drained by Well 5 experience reduction in recovery (about 6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: IRC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/16862/1/Iqmal%20Irsyad%20Mohammad%20Fuad%20FYP%20Report%20%2814796%29.pdf
http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/16862/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utp-utpedia.16862
record_format eprints
spelling my-utp-utpedia.168622017-01-25T09:36:12Z http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/16862/ Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad T Technology (General) In most cases, retrograde gas reservoir in N Field which is located at the north of Malay Basin achieved 40-70% of recovery factor (RF) compared to dry gas reservoir, 80-90% of RF. Reservoir K, a lean retrograde gas reservoir of the N Field drained by Well 5 experience reduction in recovery (about 60% of RF) that is caused by a significant productivity loss, suspected due to condensate banking effect. Condensate banking phenomenon (observed as skin) around the perforation zone restrict the flow of gas after the flowing bottom hole pressure falls below the dew point pressure. Therefore, the reduction in gas Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) limits the Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) of Reservoir K that is produced from 2008 to 2013. Miscible propane stimulated injection is proposed at mid of 2012 (where skin start increasing) to improve the IPR, well deliverability and hence reservoir recovery. The retrograde gas reservoir model is integrated between E300, IPM PROSPER (well model) and IPM MBAL (reservoir model) software in reservoir performance prediction and forecasting study. Results show that there is 4% increment in gas recovery and 6% increment in condensate recovery after injection of propane to Reservoir K. There are about 4.2 million USD increment in revenue upon propane injection development. As conclusion, propane injection could minimize the condensate saturation that improves reservoir IPR and hydrocarbon recovery for both gas and condensate. IRC 2015-01 Final Year Project NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/16862/1/Iqmal%20Irsyad%20Mohammad%20Fuad%20FYP%20Report%20%2814796%29.pdf Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad (2015) Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection. IRC, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS. (Submitted)
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Electronic and Digitized Intellectual Asset
url_provider http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad
Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection
description In most cases, retrograde gas reservoir in N Field which is located at the north of Malay Basin achieved 40-70% of recovery factor (RF) compared to dry gas reservoir, 80-90% of RF. Reservoir K, a lean retrograde gas reservoir of the N Field drained by Well 5 experience reduction in recovery (about 60% of RF) that is caused by a significant productivity loss, suspected due to condensate banking effect. Condensate banking phenomenon (observed as skin) around the perforation zone restrict the flow of gas after the flowing bottom hole pressure falls below the dew point pressure. Therefore, the reduction in gas Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) limits the Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) of Reservoir K that is produced from 2008 to 2013. Miscible propane stimulated injection is proposed at mid of 2012 (where skin start increasing) to improve the IPR, well deliverability and hence reservoir recovery. The retrograde gas reservoir model is integrated between E300, IPM PROSPER (well model) and IPM MBAL (reservoir model) software in reservoir performance prediction and forecasting study. Results show that there is 4% increment in gas recovery and 6% increment in condensate recovery after injection of propane to Reservoir K. There are about 4.2 million USD increment in revenue upon propane injection development. As conclusion, propane injection could minimize the condensate saturation that improves reservoir IPR and hydrocarbon recovery for both gas and condensate.
format Final Year Project
author Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad
author_facet Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad
author_sort Mohammad Fuad, Iqmal Irsyad
title Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection
title_short Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection
title_full Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection
title_fullStr Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection
title_full_unstemmed Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery of a Lean Retrograde Gas Reservoir under Propane Injection
title_sort improved hydrocarbon recovery of a lean retrograde gas reservoir under propane injection
publisher IRC
publishDate 2015
url http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/16862/1/Iqmal%20Irsyad%20Mohammad%20Fuad%20FYP%20Report%20%2814796%29.pdf
http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/16862/
_version_ 1739832313708019712
score 13.211869