Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes
This paper highlights the importance of ensuring empirical rigor consistent to the level of emphasis that captured the multiple realities of graduate students’ analytical information processing ability and understanding relevant conception as they heightened critical thinking skills. Assessment to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5846/1/FH02-ICODE-19-23984.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5846/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my-unisza-ir.5846 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
my-unisza-ir.58462022-02-27T06:52:15Z http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5846/ Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes Lleuvelyn Areglado, Cacha Abrizah, Abdullah L Education (General) This paper highlights the importance of ensuring empirical rigor consistent to the level of emphasis that captured the multiple realities of graduate students’ analytical information processing ability and understanding relevant conception as they heightened critical thinking skills. Assessment tools are required where students are empowered to challenge ideas, authentic searches for complex information problems, and look for workable solutions integrating information technology capabilities. The repeated measures design is one of the more practical ways to detect effect of repeated assessment, change, improved cognitive performance, an outcome that is not due to chance. To corroborate quantitative outcomes from multiple cognitive skills assessments, the researchers used qualitative approaches like open-ended survey questions, critical reflection, interviews and review of learning e-portfolios to verify intellectual efforts that can take place in an innovative way. The activities also served as validity checks between the quantitative outcome and the researchers’ analysis to interact with students’ understanding by allowing them to have a voice through their contextual interactive account of their involvement and cognitive experience during assessment. The students’ qualitative feedback are useful as they have made up for the lack of salient points in the quantitative course of investigation. 2018-12 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5846/1/FH02-ICODE-19-23984.pdf Lleuvelyn Areglado, Cacha and Abrizah, Abdullah (2018) Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes. Journal of American Academic Research, 6 (3). pp. 70-76. ISSN 2328-1227 |
| institution |
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin |
| building |
UNISZA Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin |
| content_source |
UNISZA Institutional Repository |
| url_provider |
https://eprints.unisza.edu.my/ |
| language |
English |
| topic |
L Education (General) |
| spellingShingle |
L Education (General) Lleuvelyn Areglado, Cacha Abrizah, Abdullah Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes |
| description |
This paper highlights the importance of ensuring empirical rigor consistent to the level of emphasis that
captured the multiple realities of graduate students’ analytical information processing ability and understanding
relevant conception as they heightened critical thinking skills. Assessment tools are required where students are
empowered to challenge ideas, authentic searches for complex information problems, and look for workable
solutions integrating information technology capabilities. The repeated measures design is one of the more
practical ways to detect effect of repeated assessment, change, improved cognitive performance, an outcome
that is not due to chance. To corroborate quantitative outcomes from multiple cognitive skills assessments, the
researchers used qualitative approaches like open-ended survey questions, critical reflection, interviews and
review of learning e-portfolios to verify intellectual efforts that can take place in an innovative way. The
activities also served as validity checks between the quantitative outcome and the researchers’ analysis to
interact with students’ understanding by allowing them to have a voice through their contextual interactive
account of their involvement and cognitive experience during assessment. The students’ qualitative feedback are
useful as they have made up for the lack of salient points in the quantitative course of investigation. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Lleuvelyn Areglado, Cacha Abrizah, Abdullah |
| author_facet |
Lleuvelyn Areglado, Cacha Abrizah, Abdullah |
| author_sort |
Lleuvelyn Areglado, Cacha |
| title |
Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes |
| title_short |
Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes |
| title_full |
Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes |
| title_fullStr |
Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Increasing Rigor to More Challenging Cognitive Processes |
| title_sort |
increasing rigor to more challenging cognitive processes |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5846/1/FH02-ICODE-19-23984.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5846/ |
| _version_ |
1725977001328640000 |
| score |
13.211869 |