Cover Image

A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression

The structure of family business is unique compared to the non-family business as it combines three elements, namely, family relationships, composition of owners and management structure under the name of the business. This distinctive attribute often give rise to governance issues. Under the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nazli, Ismail@Nawang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
K Law (General)
Online Access:http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2123/1/FH02-FUHA-16-05465.pdf
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2123/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-unisza-ir.2123
record_format eprints
spelling my-unisza-ir.21232021-08-15T02:47:54Z http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2123/ A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression Nazli, Ismail@Nawang K Law (General) The structure of family business is unique compared to the non-family business as it combines three elements, namely, family relationships, composition of owners and management structure under the name of the business. This distinctive attribute often give rise to governance issues. Under the conventional concept of corporate governance, directors should act in the best interest of the shareholders. In doing so, the directors’ action is governed by certain rules which specify their duties and these rules are relevant to the shareholders with respect to their rights. Although there are laws which govern the relationship between the directors and shareholders, in certain circumstances there are some latent problems. These hidden problems can be identifi ed as the fault lines in the relationship between directors and shareholders. This article discusses the issues pertaining to fault lines which may arise in a family business due to the complex and overlapping structure between directors and shareholders in a family business. Research methodology applied in this research is mainly doctrinal analysis 2011-01 Article NonPeerReviewed text en http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2123/1/FH02-FUHA-16-05465.pdf Nazli, Ismail@Nawang (2011) A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression. UUM journal of legal studies, 2 (1). pp. 17-38.
institution Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
building UNISZA Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
content_source UNISZA Institutional Repository
url_provider https://eprints.unisza.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Nazli, Ismail@Nawang
A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
description The structure of family business is unique compared to the non-family business as it combines three elements, namely, family relationships, composition of owners and management structure under the name of the business. This distinctive attribute often give rise to governance issues. Under the conventional concept of corporate governance, directors should act in the best interest of the shareholders. In doing so, the directors’ action is governed by certain rules which specify their duties and these rules are relevant to the shareholders with respect to their rights. Although there are laws which govern the relationship between the directors and shareholders, in certain circumstances there are some latent problems. These hidden problems can be identifi ed as the fault lines in the relationship between directors and shareholders. This article discusses the issues pertaining to fault lines which may arise in a family business due to the complex and overlapping structure between directors and shareholders in a family business. Research methodology applied in this research is mainly doctrinal analysis
format Article
author Nazli, Ismail@Nawang
author_facet Nazli, Ismail@Nawang
author_sort Nazli, Ismail@Nawang
title A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
title_short A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
title_full A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of the practice of the United Kingdom and Malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
title_sort comparative analysis of the practice of the united kingdom and malaysia in respect of freedom of expression
publishDate 2011
url http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2123/1/FH02-FUHA-16-05465.pdf
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2123/
_version_ 1709673141231419392
score 13.211869

Similar Items