Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus

The purpose of this within-group experimental study was to compare the effectiveness of treatment on vocabulary acquisition and retention using two explicit vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) of Rote-Copying (RC) and Read-Plus (RP). Thirty five Form 1 Malaysian secondary school learners with poor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wong, Sze Wei, Anie Attan,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM 2014
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7216/1/5067-16704-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7216/
http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/index
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.7216
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.72162016-12-14T06:43:25Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7216/ Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus Wong, Sze Wei Anie Attan, The purpose of this within-group experimental study was to compare the effectiveness of treatment on vocabulary acquisition and retention using two explicit vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) of Rote-Copying (RC) and Read-Plus (RP). Thirty five Form 1 Malaysian secondary school learners with poor English proficiency participated in both treatments for two weeks with each treatment carried out once in each week. A post-test was administered a week after the treatments. Participants read adapted texts and underwent different treatments. The RC required participants to copy L2 words, sentence in context and their translated L1 equivalent twice; while three vocabulary enhancement activities were used in RP. Nation’s 1000 Level Vocabulary Test was used in this study. Results indicate that there was no significant difference between RC and RP in vocabulary learning. Both treatments led to significant vocabulary learning, however, participants showed better vocabulary gain in the post-test after undergoing the RP treatment. Interview findings indicate that participants preferred the more cognitively-challenging RP treatment. In contrast, the RC was deemed boring and ineffective. Nevertheless, RC was useful for low proficient ESL learners. In sum, intentional VLS seemed to be the key to vocabulary learning. Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7216/1/5067-16704-1-PB.pdf Wong, Sze Wei and Anie Attan, (2014) Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 20 (2). pp. 67-80. ISSN 0128-5157 http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/index
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The purpose of this within-group experimental study was to compare the effectiveness of treatment on vocabulary acquisition and retention using two explicit vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) of Rote-Copying (RC) and Read-Plus (RP). Thirty five Form 1 Malaysian secondary school learners with poor English proficiency participated in both treatments for two weeks with each treatment carried out once in each week. A post-test was administered a week after the treatments. Participants read adapted texts and underwent different treatments. The RC required participants to copy L2 words, sentence in context and their translated L1 equivalent twice; while three vocabulary enhancement activities were used in RP. Nation’s 1000 Level Vocabulary Test was used in this study. Results indicate that there was no significant difference between RC and RP in vocabulary learning. Both treatments led to significant vocabulary learning, however, participants showed better vocabulary gain in the post-test after undergoing the RP treatment. Interview findings indicate that participants preferred the more cognitively-challenging RP treatment. In contrast, the RC was deemed boring and ineffective. Nevertheless, RC was useful for low proficient ESL learners. In sum, intentional VLS seemed to be the key to vocabulary learning.
format Article
author Wong, Sze Wei
Anie Attan,
spellingShingle Wong, Sze Wei
Anie Attan,
Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
author_facet Wong, Sze Wei
Anie Attan,
author_sort Wong, Sze Wei
title Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
title_short Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
title_full Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
title_fullStr Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
title_full_unstemmed Comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
title_sort comparing intentional vocabulary learning strategies of rote-copying versus read-plus
publisher Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM
publishDate 2014
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7216/1/5067-16704-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7216/
http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/index
_version_ 1643737048171937792
score 13.211869