Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?

The Covid-19 vaccination program was introduced by the Malaysian government to accelerate the rate of herd immunity within a short amount of time to protect the people from the Covid-19 virus. Despite the free immunization program and the proven ability to reduce the side effects of the virus, there...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masyitah Ayoib,, Siti Aishah Norizan,, Nabeel Althabhawi,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2023
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24465/1/CL%202.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24465/
https://www.ukm.my/cli/2023-5-cli/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.24465
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.244652024-11-06T00:39:41Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24465/ Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right? Masyitah Ayoib, Siti Aishah Norizan, Nabeel Althabhawi, The Covid-19 vaccination program was introduced by the Malaysian government to accelerate the rate of herd immunity within a short amount of time to protect the people from the Covid-19 virus. Despite the free immunization program and the proven ability to reduce the side effects of the virus, there are still people who refused to receive the vaccination programme for non-medical reasons. The recent restrictions imposed on the people who refused to receive the COVID-19 vaccine sparked the debate of whether it deprives the people of their fundamental rights under the Federal Constitution. Therefore, a question arises of whether the decision made by the government is morally or legally right. This article will cover the complete range of debates between legal positivists, who want to maintain a conceptual divide between law and morality, and those, such as natural theorists, who reject the idea of a law/moral separation on the matter concerning vaccination refusal and the restrictions imposed on them. Our findings indicate that the restrictions on vaccination refusal do not comply with the theories propounded by naturalists. However, the restrictions are in alignment with the legal positivists as it regards law and morality as within different ambits. So, the restrictions that come with the vaccination refusal do deprive the citizens of their fundamental rights but are in accordance with the Federal Constitution. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2023 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24465/1/CL%202.pdf Masyitah Ayoib, and Siti Aishah Norizan, and Nabeel Althabhawi, (2023) Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right? Current Legal Issues, 5 . pp. 20-27. ISSN 2550-1704 https://www.ukm.my/cli/2023-5-cli/
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The Covid-19 vaccination program was introduced by the Malaysian government to accelerate the rate of herd immunity within a short amount of time to protect the people from the Covid-19 virus. Despite the free immunization program and the proven ability to reduce the side effects of the virus, there are still people who refused to receive the vaccination programme for non-medical reasons. The recent restrictions imposed on the people who refused to receive the COVID-19 vaccine sparked the debate of whether it deprives the people of their fundamental rights under the Federal Constitution. Therefore, a question arises of whether the decision made by the government is morally or legally right. This article will cover the complete range of debates between legal positivists, who want to maintain a conceptual divide between law and morality, and those, such as natural theorists, who reject the idea of a law/moral separation on the matter concerning vaccination refusal and the restrictions imposed on them. Our findings indicate that the restrictions on vaccination refusal do not comply with the theories propounded by naturalists. However, the restrictions are in alignment with the legal positivists as it regards law and morality as within different ambits. So, the restrictions that come with the vaccination refusal do deprive the citizens of their fundamental rights but are in accordance with the Federal Constitution.
format Article
author Masyitah Ayoib,
Siti Aishah Norizan,
Nabeel Althabhawi,
spellingShingle Masyitah Ayoib,
Siti Aishah Norizan,
Nabeel Althabhawi,
Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
author_facet Masyitah Ayoib,
Siti Aishah Norizan,
Nabeel Althabhawi,
author_sort Masyitah Ayoib,
title Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
title_short Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
title_full Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
title_fullStr Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
title_full_unstemmed Limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
title_sort limitation towards anti-vaccine group: does it violate fundamental right?
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2023
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24465/1/CL%202.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24465/
https://www.ukm.my/cli/2023-5-cli/
_version_ 1814934847227953152
score 13.211869