Debt and financial performance of REITs in Malaysia : a moderating effect of financial flexibility
The use of debt by REITs entity seems to be a puzzle in numerous REITs literature, as REITs are tax-exempted business entities. The trade-off theory implies that the financing strategy of using debt provides no value in a REIT entity with a marginal tax rate of zero. However, high dividend pay-o...
保存先:
| 主要な著者: | , , , |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | English |
| 出版事項: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2017
|
| オンライン･アクセス: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20749/1/16066-65495-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20749/ https://ejournal.ukm.my/pengurusan/issue/view/1026 |
| タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
| 要約: | The use of debt by REITs entity seems to be a puzzle in numerous REITs literature, as REITs are tax-exempted business entities.
The trade-off theory implies that the financing strategy of using debt provides no value in a REIT entity with a marginal
tax rate of zero. However, high dividend pay-out requirement has limit REITs’ ability to retain its internal earnings, thus
require REITs to use debt to undertake its growth strategies. This study aims to investigate the great curiosity about the
debt financing decision of REITs in Malaysia (MREITs) at all given no tax shield benefit and to examine the moderating
effect of financial flexibility in a relationship between debt financing and the financial performance. Using the unbalanced
panel data from all MREITs for the time period between 2005 and 2014, the results of this study are consistent with the
pecking order theory in explaining the MREITs debt financing decision but are less supportive of the trade-off theory on
tax benefits and agency theory of free cash flow on disciplinary tools. This suggests that MREITs use debt to support the
growth needs than tax motives and the high dividend pay-out requirement behaves as a “disciplinary tool,” not through
the use of debt. The findings also reveal that financial flexibility plays an important role to alter the negative relationship
between debt financing and financial performance to positive relationship. This study serves as a useful guide for MREITs’
managers in managing financial flexibility as it has important moderating effects on the relationship between debt
financing and financial performance. |
|---|