Cover Image

Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city

Low cost housing (Rusunawa) Programme in Indonesia has been intended to serve low income citizens and in the same time to eradicate slum and squatter settlements in city areas. Some studies about Rusunawa Programme in Indonesia found some problems in Rusunawa affecting Rusunawa residents’ quality of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andi Wibowo,, Hamzah Jusoh,, Habibah Ahmad,, Jalaluddin Abdul Malek,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20051/1/34387-107241-1-SM.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20051/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/ebangi/issue/view/1208
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.20051
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.200512022-10-07T08:27:42Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20051/ Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city Andi Wibowo, Hamzah Jusoh, Habibah Ahmad, Jalaluddin Abdul Malek, Low cost housing (Rusunawa) Programme in Indonesia has been intended to serve low income citizens and in the same time to eradicate slum and squatter settlements in city areas. Some studies about Rusunawa Programme in Indonesia found some problems in Rusunawa affecting Rusunawa residents’ quality of life. This study is conducted to evaluate quality of life of Rusunawa residents in Tangerang City. Health, safety, convenience, income, education and social relation are indicators used to evaluate quality of life. The study used mix methods using survey and interviews. Interviews were conducted to city government officials, rusunawa management, rusunawa residents and people living around the rusunawa and survey questionnaires were distributed to 289 Rusunawa residents. The study shows that Rusunawa residents are satisfied with all aspects of quality of life but income. To overcome the problem, government needs to provide more empowerment programme for residents. Mean comparison between respondents in Rusunawa Manis and Rusunawa Gebang shows that Respondents in Manis are more convenient and have better social relation than that of in Gebang. On the contrary, respondents stated that Gebang is safer than Manis. There is no significant different in opinion between low and high income respondents. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20051/1/34387-107241-1-SM.pdf Andi Wibowo, and Hamzah Jusoh, and Habibah Ahmad, and Jalaluddin Abdul Malek, (2019) Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city. e-BANGI: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 16 (7). pp. 1-19. ISSN 1823-884x https://ejournal.ukm.my/ebangi/issue/view/1208
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Low cost housing (Rusunawa) Programme in Indonesia has been intended to serve low income citizens and in the same time to eradicate slum and squatter settlements in city areas. Some studies about Rusunawa Programme in Indonesia found some problems in Rusunawa affecting Rusunawa residents’ quality of life. This study is conducted to evaluate quality of life of Rusunawa residents in Tangerang City. Health, safety, convenience, income, education and social relation are indicators used to evaluate quality of life. The study used mix methods using survey and interviews. Interviews were conducted to city government officials, rusunawa management, rusunawa residents and people living around the rusunawa and survey questionnaires were distributed to 289 Rusunawa residents. The study shows that Rusunawa residents are satisfied with all aspects of quality of life but income. To overcome the problem, government needs to provide more empowerment programme for residents. Mean comparison between respondents in Rusunawa Manis and Rusunawa Gebang shows that Respondents in Manis are more convenient and have better social relation than that of in Gebang. On the contrary, respondents stated that Gebang is safer than Manis. There is no significant different in opinion between low and high income respondents.
format Article
author Andi Wibowo,
Hamzah Jusoh,
Habibah Ahmad,
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek,
spellingShingle Andi Wibowo,
Hamzah Jusoh,
Habibah Ahmad,
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek,
Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city
author_facet Andi Wibowo,
Hamzah Jusoh,
Habibah Ahmad,
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek,
author_sort Andi Wibowo,
title Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city
title_short Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city
title_full Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city
title_fullStr Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in Tangerang city
title_sort evaluation of residents’ quality of life of low cost housing programme in tangerang city
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2019
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20051/1/34387-107241-1-SM.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20051/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/ebangi/issue/view/1208
_version_ 1748181760637665280
score 13.211869

Similar Items