Thinking cancer metaphorically: a sociocultural perspective study on the cancer patients’ narratives
Cancer is a complex disease that is usually difficult to talk about. Many cancer patients turn to metaphors in describing the disease and their cancer experiences as this allows them to communicate those experiences more effectively. While much research has been carried out on examining the diff...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2020
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17297/1/34007-148159-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17297/ https://ejournal.ukm.my/akademika/issue/view/1298 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Cancer is a complex disease that is usually difficult to talk about. Many cancer patients turn to metaphors in describing
the disease and their cancer experiences as this allows them to communicate those experiences more effectively. While
much research has been carried out on examining the different types of metaphors used by cancer patients, much more
needs to be known about the metaphors used by them in relation to their sociocultural background and cognition. This
study seeks to address this knowledge gap by examining the metaphors used among cancer patients to describe the
disease and their cancer experiences. Most importantly, the study aims to investigate how these metaphors are shaped by
the patients’ sociocultural background. Using the Metaphorical Identification Procedure (MIP), the study analysed the
data collected from 31 cancer patients from Kuching, Sarawak through semi-structured interview. The results show that
the patients turned to “structural”, “conspiracy” and “journey” metaphors and several other metaphors to describe
the disease and their cancer experiences. The results also show that the cancer metaphors used by these patients were
mostly shaped by their personal life experiences and their sociocultural understanding. The study concludes that the
findings could have implications on the current debates over the use of cancer metaphors in oncology and help to drive
some recommendations. |
---|