The impact of audit market concentration and market power on audit fees: a comparison of Indonesia and Singapore
This study aims to investigate the effect of audit market concentration and market power on audit fees in Indonesia (high audit market concentration) and Singapore (low audit market concentration). The sample is listed companies from 2012-2015. Market concentration was calculated by the Herfinda...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2020
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16892/1/45190-145632-2-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16892/ https://ejournals.ukm.my/pengurusan/issue/view/1366 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study aims to investigate the effect of audit market concentration and market power on audit fees in
Indonesia (high audit market concentration) and Singapore (low audit market concentration). The sample is
listed companies from 2012-2015. Market concentration was calculated by the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index,
while market power is the difference in market share between one audit firm and another audit firm that has the
closest market share. Regression result found that the effect of market concentration on audit fees depends on
the level of market competition in the country. In countries where the level of competition is low (such us
Singapore), if market concentration increases, the rivalry will decrease. The remaining audit firm is not worried
about losing clients because the number of players in the market has decreased and eventually dare to increase
audit fees. In contrast, countries that have a high rivalry (such us Indonesia), when the market concentration
increases, the competition among the remaining audit firms is still high (because there are many audit firms).
As a result, the remaining audit firm gives a discounted price to win the competition and thus audit fee will
decrease. However, if there are stringent regulations and strong law enforcement (like Singapore), audit fees
could not be altered by market concentration, especially by market power in a form of monopoly. Audit market
rivalry in Indonesia is relatively high. Hence, robust supervision and monitoring are required from authority to
ensure that unfair audit fees will not emanated from the competitive audit market. Additionally, regulators need
to pay attention on this topic due to the fact that unhealthy competition may create biased audit pricing that
affect audit quality. |
|---|