Cover Image

Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study

The purpose of this study was to explore a surface marker-assisted method for orbital floor reconstruction. Six adults, dry human skulls were used in this study. First, an individualised, 0.4 mm aluminum orbital implant was prepared for orbital floor bilaterally. Four physical implant surface marker...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nazimi Abd Jabar,, Nuraudi Zafirah AR,, Nur Syaira I,, Izhar AA,, Muhd Fazlynizam R,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2020
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15126/1/22_ms0404_pdf_69245.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15126/
http://www.medicineandhealthukm.com/toc/15/1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.15126
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.151262020-08-26T02:36:03Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15126/ Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study Nazimi Abd Jabar, Nuraudi Zafirah AR, Nur Syaira I, Izhar AA, Muhd Fazlynizam R, The purpose of this study was to explore a surface marker-assisted method for orbital floor reconstruction. Six adults, dry human skulls were used in this study. First, an individualised, 0.4 mm aluminum orbital implant was prepared for orbital floor bilaterally. Four physical implant surface markers in the anterior and posterior aspects of the implant were created and subjected for an optical scan. Preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained for all orbital floors. The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data were retrieved, imported and virtually reconstructed with its respective orbital implant stereolithography (STL) data by using iPlan CMF (Version 3.0, BrainLab, Germany). Navigation image-fusion technique was performed for each skull following navigation-assisted reconstruction and postoperative CBCT. Computed tomography (CT)-assisted measurements of the implant positions were evaluated between the virtually planned and realized implant positions in its translational differences sagittal and coronal planes. All statistical analysis was performed using PASW® Statistics Version 18. Results showed that38 out of the 48 surface markers evaluated showed a small elevation in realized compared to the virtual orbital implant position. Translation for the Euclidean metric showed differences of less than 1.00 mm in all surface markers except at the posterior ledge and anterior when assessed in the sagittal plane. The study showed that the placement of surface marker-assisted in orbital navigation surgery provides a consistent orbital implant position. Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2020 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15126/1/22_ms0404_pdf_69245.pdf Nazimi Abd Jabar, and Nuraudi Zafirah AR, and Nur Syaira I, and Izhar AA, and Muhd Fazlynizam R, (2020) Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study. Medicine & Health, 15 (1). pp. 237-249. ISSN 2289-5728 http://www.medicineandhealthukm.com/toc/15/1
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The purpose of this study was to explore a surface marker-assisted method for orbital floor reconstruction. Six adults, dry human skulls were used in this study. First, an individualised, 0.4 mm aluminum orbital implant was prepared for orbital floor bilaterally. Four physical implant surface markers in the anterior and posterior aspects of the implant were created and subjected for an optical scan. Preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained for all orbital floors. The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data were retrieved, imported and virtually reconstructed with its respective orbital implant stereolithography (STL) data by using iPlan CMF (Version 3.0, BrainLab, Germany). Navigation image-fusion technique was performed for each skull following navigation-assisted reconstruction and postoperative CBCT. Computed tomography (CT)-assisted measurements of the implant positions were evaluated between the virtually planned and realized implant positions in its translational differences sagittal and coronal planes. All statistical analysis was performed using PASW® Statistics Version 18. Results showed that38 out of the 48 surface markers evaluated showed a small elevation in realized compared to the virtual orbital implant position. Translation for the Euclidean metric showed differences of less than 1.00 mm in all surface markers except at the posterior ledge and anterior when assessed in the sagittal plane. The study showed that the placement of surface marker-assisted in orbital navigation surgery provides a consistent orbital implant position.
format Article
author Nazimi Abd Jabar,
Nuraudi Zafirah AR,
Nur Syaira I,
Izhar AA,
Muhd Fazlynizam R,
spellingShingle Nazimi Abd Jabar,
Nuraudi Zafirah AR,
Nur Syaira I,
Izhar AA,
Muhd Fazlynizam R,
Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
author_facet Nazimi Abd Jabar,
Nuraudi Zafirah AR,
Nur Syaira I,
Izhar AA,
Muhd Fazlynizam R,
author_sort Nazimi Abd Jabar,
title Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
title_short Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
title_full Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
title_fullStr Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
title_full_unstemmed Surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
title_sort surface marker-assisted for orbital navigation surgery: a dry skull study
publisher Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2020
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15126/1/22_ms0404_pdf_69245.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/15126/
http://www.medicineandhealthukm.com/toc/15/1
_version_ 1677782242368159744
score 13.211869

Similar Items