Welcome to the desert of the real: resisting a postcolonial reality in the modern Irish novel
Benedict Anderson claims In Imagined Communities that nationalism and national identity are but fruits of a politicised imagination, and that the nation only acts what the State imagines. A decade later, in Tom Inglis re-examines such an imagination in a postcolonial Irish context, and traces the...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2017
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11290/1/15199-54513-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11290/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/972 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Benedict Anderson claims In Imagined Communities that nationalism and national identity are but fruits
of a politicised imagination, and that the nation only acts what the State imagines. A decade later, in
Tom Inglis re-examines such an imagination in a postcolonial Irish context, and traces the significance
of the land in the process of identity formation. Anderson’s and Inglis’s understanding of personal
identity formation resonate with the Deleuzian reading of a Rhizome-based local identity set against a
monolithic backdrop of root-tree system. Where the former variety promises an animate, multifaceted
identity, the latter conditions the development of Irishness to a closed system in which values are yet to
be pronounced by the governing root, namely, the State. This is where one can draw the very red thin
line between personal and national perception of reality (of being). The multilayered and dialectical
nature of the modern Irish novel and its critical caliber has created an accurate touchstone that enables
the Irish to identify the very two sides of reality. For the Irish, on the one hand, reality emerges as a
monolithic, obdurate construct, fabricated and observed by the State; and on the other, it materialises as
the nation’s memory of economic hardships, political marginalisation, ideological bifurcations, and
psychological exiles. By exploring James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916) and
Flann O’Brien’s The Third Policeman (1974), this paper shall answer the question that Anderson and
Inglis failed to address: what made the contemporary Irish literature a difficult reflection of postcolonial
identity, which neither accepts the State’s atavistic nativism nor identifies with neocolonial political
mindset? |
---|