Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet
Shakespeare’s Hamlet, as a revenge tragedy, demonstrates an ambience of terror. This ambience emerges in two works which have appropriated the play: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski (2009) and The Dead Fathers Club by Matt Haig (2006). However, the present article tends to presume...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10143/1/9384-33387-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10143/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/750 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my-ukm.journal.10143 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
my-ukm.journal.101432017-02-23T04:02:48Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10143/ Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet Mohammad Safaei, Shakespeare’s Hamlet, as a revenge tragedy, demonstrates an ambience of terror. This ambience emerges in two works which have appropriated the play: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski (2009) and The Dead Fathers Club by Matt Haig (2006). However, the present article tends to presume the contemporary history, i.e. post 9/11 era, as the basis for investigating a variety of themes and relations between Hamlet and its two novelistic appropriations. Drawing upon the work of experts in terrorism psychology, I explore the psychological commonalities of the modern Hamlets, who can be distinguished by their isolation, vulnerability, and self-delusion. Attempts are also made to investigate the psychological bases for the juxtaposition of the specters in the two novels with the terrorist leadership in today’s world. Appropriative literature is often denigrated for its lack of originality and being indebted to its canonical sources; such a reductionist assumption stems from our conception of appropriative literature as the recycling of previous literary works. This paper attempts to demonstrate that the two novels are not to be readily categorized as cultural or artistic reuse of Hamlet. In the same way that Hamlet reveals the political tensions of Elizabethan reign, its two modern appropriations can arguably reflect the social and psychological symptoms of terrorism in our era. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2016-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10143/1/9384-33387-1-PB.pdf Mohammad Safaei, (2016) Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 16 (1). pp. 169-182. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/750 |
| institution |
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| building |
Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| content_source |
UKM Journal Article Repository |
| url_provider |
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/ |
| language |
English |
| description |
Shakespeare’s Hamlet, as a revenge tragedy, demonstrates an ambience of terror. This
ambience emerges in two works which have appropriated the play: The Story of Edgar
Sawtelle by David Wroblewski (2009) and The Dead Fathers Club by Matt Haig (2006).
However, the present article tends to presume the contemporary history, i.e. post 9/11 era, as
the basis for investigating a variety of themes and relations between Hamlet and its two
novelistic appropriations. Drawing upon the work of experts in terrorism psychology, I
explore the psychological commonalities of the modern Hamlets, who can be distinguished
by their isolation, vulnerability, and self-delusion. Attempts are also made to investigate the
psychological bases for the juxtaposition of the specters in the two novels with the terrorist
leadership in today’s world. Appropriative literature is often denigrated for its lack of
originality and being indebted to its canonical sources; such a reductionist assumption stems
from our conception of appropriative literature as the recycling of previous literary works.
This paper attempts to demonstrate that the two novels are not to be readily categorized as
cultural or artistic reuse of Hamlet. In the same way that Hamlet reveals the political tensions
of Elizabethan reign, its two modern appropriations can arguably reflect the social and
psychological symptoms of terrorism in our era. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Mohammad Safaei, |
| spellingShingle |
Mohammad Safaei, Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet |
| author_facet |
Mohammad Safaei, |
| author_sort |
Mohammad Safaei, |
| title |
Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet |
| title_short |
Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet |
| title_full |
Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet |
| title_fullStr |
Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of Hamlet |
| title_sort |
terrorism in two novelistic appropriations of hamlet |
| publisher |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10143/1/9384-33387-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10143/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/750 |
| _version_ |
1643738021226348544 |
| score |
13.211869 |