Redefining landmarks
Paths, nodes, districts, landmarks and edges as classified by Kevin Lynch have been strongly debated since the 1960’s and the typical issue of contentment would be about the overlapping definitions between some categories and their order of importance. For example, can a node be a landmark? Some c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Monograph |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2007
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/3578/1/REDEFINING__LANDMARKS.1.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/3578/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44179484_Redefining_landmarks |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1845470926358970368 |
|---|---|
| author | Lamit, Hasanuddin |
| author_facet | Lamit, Hasanuddin |
| author_sort | Lamit, Hasanuddin |
| building | UTM Library |
| collection | Institutional Repository |
| content_provider | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
| content_source | UTM Institutional Repository |
| continent | Asia |
| country | Malaysia |
| description | Paths, nodes, districts, landmarks and edges as classified by Kevin Lynch have been strongly debated since the 1960’s and the typical issue of contentment would be about the overlapping definitions between some categories and their order of importance. For example, can a node be a landmark? Some commentators consider that landmarks are one of the most significant urban components and possibly more important than other components that require examination and appraisal. This paper will discuss if landmarks can be perceived beyond their archetypal perception of being tall, large, monumental, distinct, and referring only to buildings or towers. It is the aim of the study to expand the notion of landmarks into several categories. |
| format | Monograph |
| id | my.utm.eprints-3578 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publisher | 2007 |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | my.utm.eprints-35782017-09-06T04:44:12Z http://eprints.utm.my/3578/ Redefining landmarks Lamit, Hasanuddin NA Architecture Paths, nodes, districts, landmarks and edges as classified by Kevin Lynch have been strongly debated since the 1960’s and the typical issue of contentment would be about the overlapping definitions between some categories and their order of importance. For example, can a node be a landmark? Some commentators consider that landmarks are one of the most significant urban components and possibly more important than other components that require examination and appraisal. This paper will discuss if landmarks can be perceived beyond their archetypal perception of being tall, large, monumental, distinct, and referring only to buildings or towers. It is the aim of the study to expand the notion of landmarks into several categories. 2007 2007 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/3578/1/REDEFINING__LANDMARKS.1.pdf Lamit, Hasanuddin (2007) Redefining landmarks. Working Paper. 2007. (Unpublished) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44179484_Redefining_landmarks |
| spellingShingle | NA Architecture Lamit, Hasanuddin Redefining landmarks |
| title | Redefining landmarks |
| title_full | Redefining landmarks |
| title_fullStr | Redefining landmarks |
| title_full_unstemmed | Redefining landmarks |
| title_short | Redefining landmarks |
| title_sort | redefining landmarks |
| topic | NA Architecture |
| url | http://eprints.utm.my/3578/1/REDEFINING__LANDMARKS.1.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/3578/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44179484_Redefining_landmarks |
| url_provider | http://eprints.utm.my/ |