Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application

The previous decade witnessed the increased popularity and rapid development of graphical user interface (GUI). GUI is a type of computer– human interface thatallows users to communicate with their computers. This interface has significantly contributed to the popularity of recently developed softwa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nser Brka, Mostafa
Format: Thesis
Language:en
en
en
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/2/MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/1/24p%20MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/3/MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA%20WATERMARK.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1833416783759933440
author Nser Brka, Mostafa
author_facet Nser Brka, Mostafa
author_sort Nser Brka, Mostafa
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description The previous decade witnessed the increased popularity and rapid development of graphical user interface (GUI). GUI is a type of computer– human interface thatallows users to communicate with their computers. This interface has significantly contributed to the popularity of recently developed software applications. Given the importance of working under an error-free GUI, the correctness of such GUI must be tested at all times. GUI testing involves checking the screens for controls, such as menus, buttons, icons and all types of bars, including tool bars, menu bars, dialog boxes and software windows. Event Flow Graph (EFG) and Behavior ExplorerTesting (BXT) are two of the techniques used to generate test cases on GUIcomponents. The correctness and time required for these two techniques to generate GUI test cases are compared in this project by using the techniques in Paint and Present applications. EFG and BXT obtained correctness rates of 9.61% and 36.81% respectively for the paint application and 5.18% and 39.33% respectively for the Present application. Therefore, BXT exhibits more correctness than EFG. In term of elapsed time, EFG and BXT spent 0.16 millisecond (ms) and 0.18 ms in the paint application respectively and 0.14 millisecond (ms) and 0.17 millisecond (ms) in the Present application respectively. Therefore, EFG is slightly faster than BXT in generating test cases. Overall, BXT is better than EFG in generating GUI test cases.
format Thesis
id my.uthm.eprints-1382
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
language en
en
en
publishDate 2015
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints-13822021-10-03T06:37:17Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/ Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application Nser Brka, Mostafa QA76 Computer software The previous decade witnessed the increased popularity and rapid development of graphical user interface (GUI). GUI is a type of computer– human interface thatallows users to communicate with their computers. This interface has significantly contributed to the popularity of recently developed software applications. Given the importance of working under an error-free GUI, the correctness of such GUI must be tested at all times. GUI testing involves checking the screens for controls, such as menus, buttons, icons and all types of bars, including tool bars, menu bars, dialog boxes and software windows. Event Flow Graph (EFG) and Behavior ExplorerTesting (BXT) are two of the techniques used to generate test cases on GUIcomponents. The correctness and time required for these two techniques to generate GUI test cases are compared in this project by using the techniques in Paint and Present applications. EFG and BXT obtained correctness rates of 9.61% and 36.81% respectively for the paint application and 5.18% and 39.33% respectively for the Present application. Therefore, BXT exhibits more correctness than EFG. In term of elapsed time, EFG and BXT spent 0.16 millisecond (ms) and 0.18 ms in the paint application respectively and 0.14 millisecond (ms) and 0.17 millisecond (ms) in the Present application respectively. Therefore, EFG is slightly faster than BXT in generating test cases. Overall, BXT is better than EFG in generating GUI test cases. 2015-09 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/2/MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/1/24p%20MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA.pdf text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/3/MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA%20WATERMARK.pdf Nser Brka, Mostafa (2015) Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application. Masters thesis, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
spellingShingle QA76 Computer software
Nser Brka, Mostafa
Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application
title Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application
title_full Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application
title_fullStr Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application
title_short Comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using EFG and BXT techniques for GUI application
title_sort comparative study on correctness and time taken of test case generation using efg and bxt techniques for gui application
topic QA76 Computer software
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/2/MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/1/24p%20MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/3/MOSTAFA%20NSER%20BRKA%20WATERMARK.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1382/
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/