Energy yields from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent

Three different suspended-growth anaerobic digestion configurations-the mesophilic one-stage, the mesophilic two-phase and the thermophilic one-stage, were used to treat palm oil mill effluent (POME) and their performances compared. The mesophilic two-phase process showed the highest energy yields w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ng, W. J., Chin, K. K., Wong, K. K.
Format: Article
Language:en
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 1987
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/116042/1/116042.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/116042/
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0269748387900590
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Three different suspended-growth anaerobic digestion configurations-the mesophilic one-stage, the mesophilic two-phase and the thermophilic one-stage, were used to treat palm oil mill effluent (POME) and their performances compared. The mesophilic two-phase process showed the highest energy yields which reached 20 542 J g-1 COD utilized at a hydraulic retention time of 31 days. However, high energy yields did not coincide with high TCOD removals. The latter was a characteristic of the thermophilic process. The relatively poor TCOD removal in the two-phase system was due to its lower efficiency in VSS removal. At hydraulic retention times of 25 days and more the mesophilic one-stage process had higher energy yields than the thermophilic process. Anaerobic digestion was found to be an effective means for POME treatment. © 1987.