Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots

This study was performed to i) compare root distribution of legume/nonlegume intercrops determined by qPCR and amplicon sequencing (Metabarcoding) to root growth of the individual species determined visually, and ii) compare the qPCR and amplicon sequencing techniques as a method for quantifying roo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Affendy Hassan, Dorte Bodin Dresbølla, Camilla Ruø Rasmussen, Annemette Lyhne-Kjærbye, Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen, Michaela Schiller Stokholm, Ole Søgaard Lund, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen
Format: Article
Language:en
en
Published: Informa UK Limited 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/1/Root%20distribution%20in%20intercropping%20systems%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20of%20DNA%20based%20methods%20and%20visual%20distinction%20of%20roots.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/2/Root%20distribution%20in%20intercropping%20systems%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20of%20DNA%20based%20methods%20and%20visual%20distinction%20of%20roots1.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872
https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1831795245809926144
author Affendy Hassan
Dorte Bodin Dresbølla
Camilla Ruø Rasmussen
Annemette Lyhne-Kjærbye
Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen
Michaela Schiller Stokholm
Ole Søgaard Lund
Kristian Thorup-Kristensen
author_facet Affendy Hassan
Dorte Bodin Dresbølla
Camilla Ruø Rasmussen
Annemette Lyhne-Kjærbye
Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen
Michaela Schiller Stokholm
Ole Søgaard Lund
Kristian Thorup-Kristensen
author_sort Affendy Hassan
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description This study was performed to i) compare root distribution of legume/nonlegume intercrops determined by qPCR and amplicon sequencing (Metabarcoding) to root growth of the individual species determined visually, and ii) compare the qPCR and amplicon sequencing techniques as a method for quantifying root growth of individual species grown in mixtures. Red beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv Detroit) and lucerne (Medicago sativa L. cv Creno) were grown in one-meter-high transparent tubes. Root competition was studied by direct observation on the tube surface determining root intensity (RI), root wash and extraction followed by determination of root length density (RLD), and DNA-based methods. Intercropping decreased lucerne RI strongly, whereas the RI of red beet was not affected. The determination of RLD did not allow us to distinguish species in mixed samples. However, both DNA methods showed apparently a tendency to overestimate the fraction of lucerne roots compared to the direct root observations. The discrepancy between methods was explained by the fact that visual methods provide estimates of root length while the DNA methods provide estimates of root mass. In conclusion, DNA-based estimates of species fractions in mixed root samples give valuable information on root interactions in mixed crops.
format Article
id my.ums.eprints-34021
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
language en
en
publishDate 2019
publisher Informa UK Limited
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints-340212022-08-29T02:59:44Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/ Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots Affendy Hassan Dorte Bodin Dresbølla Camilla Ruø Rasmussen Annemette Lyhne-Kjærbye Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen Michaela Schiller Stokholm Ole Søgaard Lund Kristian Thorup-Kristensen QK640-(707) Plant anatomy This study was performed to i) compare root distribution of legume/nonlegume intercrops determined by qPCR and amplicon sequencing (Metabarcoding) to root growth of the individual species determined visually, and ii) compare the qPCR and amplicon sequencing techniques as a method for quantifying root growth of individual species grown in mixtures. Red beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv Detroit) and lucerne (Medicago sativa L. cv Creno) were grown in one-meter-high transparent tubes. Root competition was studied by direct observation on the tube surface determining root intensity (RI), root wash and extraction followed by determination of root length density (RLD), and DNA-based methods. Intercropping decreased lucerne RI strongly, whereas the RI of red beet was not affected. The determination of RLD did not allow us to distinguish species in mixed samples. However, both DNA methods showed apparently a tendency to overestimate the fraction of lucerne roots compared to the direct root observations. The discrepancy between methods was explained by the fact that visual methods provide estimates of root length while the DNA methods provide estimates of root mass. In conclusion, DNA-based estimates of species fractions in mixed root samples give valuable information on root interactions in mixed crops. Informa UK Limited 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/1/Root%20distribution%20in%20intercropping%20systems%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20of%20DNA%20based%20methods%20and%20visual%20distinction%20of%20roots.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/2/Root%20distribution%20in%20intercropping%20systems%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20of%20DNA%20based%20methods%20and%20visual%20distinction%20of%20roots1.pdf Affendy Hassan and Dorte Bodin Dresbølla and Camilla Ruø Rasmussen and Annemette Lyhne-Kjærbye and Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen and Michaela Schiller Stokholm and Ole Søgaard Lund and Kristian Thorup-Kristensen (2019) Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots. Archives of Agronomy And Soil Science, 67 (1). pp. 15-28. ISSN 0365-0340 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872 https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872 https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872
spellingShingle QK640-(707) Plant anatomy
Affendy Hassan
Dorte Bodin Dresbølla
Camilla Ruø Rasmussen
Annemette Lyhne-Kjærbye
Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen
Michaela Schiller Stokholm
Ole Søgaard Lund
Kristian Thorup-Kristensen
Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots
title Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots
title_full Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots
title_fullStr Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots
title_full_unstemmed Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots
title_short Root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots
title_sort root distribution in intercropping systems – a comparison of dna based methods and visual distinction of roots
topic QK640-(707) Plant anatomy
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/1/Root%20distribution%20in%20intercropping%20systems%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20of%20DNA%20based%20methods%20and%20visual%20distinction%20of%20roots.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/2/Root%20distribution%20in%20intercropping%20systems%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20of%20DNA%20based%20methods%20and%20visual%20distinction%20of%20roots1.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34021/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872
https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872
https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1675872
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/