Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations

Evidence for compression, or minimization of code length, has been found across biological systems from genomes to human language and music. Two linguistic laws—Menzerath's Law (which states that longer sequences consist of shorter constituents) and Zipf's Law of abbreviation (a negative r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dena J. Clink, Abdul Hamid Ahmad, Holger Klinck
Format: Article
Language:en
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/1/Brevity%20is%20not%20a%20universal%20in%20animal%20communication.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200151
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1831793748485341184
author Dena J. Clink
Abdul Hamid Ahmad
Holger Klinck
author_facet Dena J. Clink
Abdul Hamid Ahmad
Holger Klinck
author_sort Dena J. Clink
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description Evidence for compression, or minimization of code length, has been found across biological systems from genomes to human language and music. Two linguistic laws—Menzerath's Law (which states that longer sequences consist of shorter constituents) and Zipf's Law of abbreviation (a negative relationship between signal length and frequency of use)—are predictions of compression. It has been proposed that compression is a universal in animal communication, but there have been mixed results, particularly in reference to Zipf's Law of abbreviation. Like songbirds, male gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) engage in long solo bouts with unique combinations of notes which combine into phrases. We found strong support for Menzerath's Law as the longer a phrase, the shorter the notes. To identify phrase types, we used state-of-the-art affinity propagation clustering, and were able to predict phrase types using support vector machines with a mean accuracy of 74%. Based on unsupervised phrase type classification, we did not find support for Zipf's Law of abbreviation. Our results indicate that adherence to linguistic laws in male gibbon solos depends on the unit of analysis. We conclude that principles of compression are applicable outside of human language, but may act differently across levels of organization in biological systems.
format Article
id my.ums.eprints-25614
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
language en
publishDate 2020
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints-256142021-03-30T00:29:17Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/ Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations Dena J. Clink Abdul Hamid Ahmad Holger Klinck SF Animal culture Evidence for compression, or minimization of code length, has been found across biological systems from genomes to human language and music. Two linguistic laws—Menzerath's Law (which states that longer sequences consist of shorter constituents) and Zipf's Law of abbreviation (a negative relationship between signal length and frequency of use)—are predictions of compression. It has been proposed that compression is a universal in animal communication, but there have been mixed results, particularly in reference to Zipf's Law of abbreviation. Like songbirds, male gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) engage in long solo bouts with unique combinations of notes which combine into phrases. We found strong support for Menzerath's Law as the longer a phrase, the shorter the notes. To identify phrase types, we used state-of-the-art affinity propagation clustering, and were able to predict phrase types using support vector machines with a mean accuracy of 74%. Based on unsupervised phrase type classification, we did not find support for Zipf's Law of abbreviation. Our results indicate that adherence to linguistic laws in male gibbon solos depends on the unit of analysis. We conclude that principles of compression are applicable outside of human language, but may act differently across levels of organization in biological systems. 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/1/Brevity%20is%20not%20a%20universal%20in%20animal%20communication.pdf Dena J. Clink and Abdul Hamid Ahmad and Holger Klinck (2020) Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations. Royal Society Open Science, 7 (20015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200151
spellingShingle SF Animal culture
Dena J. Clink
Abdul Hamid Ahmad
Holger Klinck
Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
title Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
title_full Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
title_fullStr Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
title_full_unstemmed Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
title_short Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: Evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
title_sort brevity is not a universal in animal communication: evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations
topic SF Animal culture
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/1/Brevity%20is%20not%20a%20universal%20in%20animal%20communication.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200151
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/