Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline

Vehicle efficiency relates to pollutants and cost savings in third world countries. In term of subcompact cars, the vehicle characteristics are governed by the engine for alternative fuels. The main focus of this paper is to evaluate a sub compact car engine for its performance and burn rate of gaso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D., Ramasamy, K., Kadirgama, R. A., Bakar, Z. A., Zainal
Format: Article
Language:en
Published: Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/1/fkm-2014-devarajan-mass_fraction_burn.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/
http://www.scientific.net/AMM.660.442
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1831522439205486592
author D., Ramasamy
K., Kadirgama
R. A., Bakar
Z. A., Zainal
author_facet D., Ramasamy
K., Kadirgama
R. A., Bakar
Z. A., Zainal
author_sort D., Ramasamy
building UMPSA Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
content_source UMPSA Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description Vehicle efficiency relates to pollutants and cost savings in third world countries. In term of subcompact cars, the vehicle characteristics are governed by the engine for alternative fuels. The main focus of this paper is to evaluate a sub compact car engine for its performance and burn rate of gasoline and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). A bi-fuel sequential system was used to do this evaluation. Measurements of engine speed, torque and fuel were done on an eddy current dynamometer, while measurements or in-cylinder pressure, crank angle and spark were analyzed from results taken by data acquisition system. The emissions readings were also compared from an emission analyzer. The results were analyzed for burn rate based on the first law of thermodynamic. The comparison show a drop of 18.6% for the power, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) loss was 7% and efficiency loss was at 17.3% in average for all engine speed. Pressure analysis shows peak pressure dropped by 16%. Burn rate shows why CNG had a slower burning speed on the small engine. The engine speed of 4000 rpm at Maximum Brake Torque (MBT) produced the most nearest results to gasoline
format Article
id my.ump.umpir.8445
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
language en
publishDate 2014
publisher Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.84452018-01-31T00:02:24Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/ Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline D., Ramasamy K., Kadirgama R. A., Bakar Z. A., Zainal TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Vehicle efficiency relates to pollutants and cost savings in third world countries. In term of subcompact cars, the vehicle characteristics are governed by the engine for alternative fuels. The main focus of this paper is to evaluate a sub compact car engine for its performance and burn rate of gasoline and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). A bi-fuel sequential system was used to do this evaluation. Measurements of engine speed, torque and fuel were done on an eddy current dynamometer, while measurements or in-cylinder pressure, crank angle and spark were analyzed from results taken by data acquisition system. The emissions readings were also compared from an emission analyzer. The results were analyzed for burn rate based on the first law of thermodynamic. The comparison show a drop of 18.6% for the power, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) loss was 7% and efficiency loss was at 17.3% in average for all engine speed. Pressure analysis shows peak pressure dropped by 16%. Burn rate shows why CNG had a slower burning speed on the small engine. The engine speed of 4000 rpm at Maximum Brake Torque (MBT) produced the most nearest results to gasoline Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 2014-08-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/1/fkm-2014-devarajan-mass_fraction_burn.pdf D., Ramasamy and K., Kadirgama and R. A., Bakar and Z. A., Zainal (2014) Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 660. pp. 442-446. ISSN 1662-7482. (Published) http://www.scientific.net/AMM.660.442 DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.660.442
spellingShingle TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
D., Ramasamy
K., Kadirgama
R. A., Bakar
Z. A., Zainal
Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_full Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_fullStr Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_full_unstemmed Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_short Mass Fraction Burn Comparison of Compressed Natural Gas and Gasoline
title_sort mass fraction burn comparison of compressed natural gas and gasoline
topic TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/1/fkm-2014-devarajan-mass_fraction_burn.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8445/
http://www.scientific.net/AMM.660.442
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/