Autologous chondrocyte transplantation in the repair of full-thickness focal cartilage damage in rabbits

PURPOSE:To compare the efficacy of autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) versus non-operative measures for cartilage repair in rabbits. METHODS:Nine New Zealand white rabbits were used. Identical focal defects were created in the articular cartilage of both knees. One month later, the right k...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamarul, Tunku, Selvaratnam, L., Masjuddin, T., Ab-Rahim, S., Ng, C., Chan, K.Y., Ahmad, T.S.T.
Format: Article
Language:en
Published: SAGE Publications (UK and US) 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/3217/1/Autologous_Chondrocyte_Transplantation_in_the_Repair_of_Full-thickness_Focal_Cartilage_Damage_in_Rabbits.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/3217/
https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSE:To compare the efficacy of autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) versus non-operative measures for cartilage repair in rabbits. METHODS:Nine New Zealand white rabbits were used. Identical focal defects were created in the articular cartilage of both knees. One month later, the right knee was repaired via ACT, while the left knee was left untreated (control group). The quality of cartilage tissues in both knees was compared 3 months later, according to the quantitative analysis of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) in the cartilage and macroscopic examination of histology using the Brittberg/International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) score. RESULTS:Microscopic examination showed enhanced regeneration following ACT repair. Quantification analysis revealed significantly higher cellular expression of GAG in the ACT-treated knees (1.12 vs 0.81 microgram GAGs/mg protein, p=0.008). The mean Brittberg/ICRS score was significantly higher in the treated knees (6.00 vs 1.89, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: ACT is superior to non-operative measures for repairing focal cartilage defects, as determined by favourable histological and immunohistological outcomes at the cellular level.