Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population

Objective: To explore how many millimeters of tooth size discrepancy (TSD) are clinically significant, to determine what percentage of a representative orthodontic population has such a tooth size discrepancy, and to determine the ability of simple visual inspection to detect such a discrepancy. Mat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Othman, S.A., Harradine, N.
Format: Article
Language:en
Published: E.H. Angle Education and Research Foundation 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/2802/1/Tooth_size_discrepancies_in_an_orthodontic_population.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/2802/
http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/031406-102
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1831446467332538368
author Othman, S.A.
Harradine, N.
author_facet Othman, S.A.
Harradine, N.
author_sort Othman, S.A.
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description Objective: To explore how many millimeters of tooth size discrepancy (TSD) are clinically significant, to determine what percentage of a representative orthodontic population has such a tooth size discrepancy, and to determine the ability of simple visual inspection to detect such a discrepancy. Materials and Methods: The sample comprised 150 pretreatment study casts with fully erupted and complete permanent dentitions from first molar to first molar, which were selected randomly from 1100 consecutively treated white orthodontic patients. The mesiodistal diameter tooth sizes were measured using digital calipers, and the Bolton analysis and the tooth size corrections were calculated by the Hamilton Arch Tooth System (HATS) software. Simple visual estimation of Bolton discrepancy was also performed. Results: In the sample group 17.4 had anterior tooth-width ratios and 5.4 had total arch ratios greater than 2 of Bolton's standard deviations from Bolton's mean. For the anterior analysis, correction greater than +/- 2 mm was required for 16 of patients in the upper arch or 9 in the lower arch. For the total arch analysis, the corresponding figures are 28 and 24. Conclusions: It is recommended that 2 mm of required tooth size correction is an appropriate threshold for clinical significance. A significant percentage of patients have a TSD of this size. Visual estimation of TSD has low sensitivity and specificity. Careful measurement is more frequently required in clinical practice than visual estimation would suggest.
format Article
id my.um.eprints-2802
institution Universiti Malaya
language en
publishDate 2007
publisher E.H. Angle Education and Research Foundation
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints-28022020-01-14T02:44:26Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/2802/ Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population Othman, S.A. Harradine, N. RK Dentistry Objective: To explore how many millimeters of tooth size discrepancy (TSD) are clinically significant, to determine what percentage of a representative orthodontic population has such a tooth size discrepancy, and to determine the ability of simple visual inspection to detect such a discrepancy. Materials and Methods: The sample comprised 150 pretreatment study casts with fully erupted and complete permanent dentitions from first molar to first molar, which were selected randomly from 1100 consecutively treated white orthodontic patients. The mesiodistal diameter tooth sizes were measured using digital calipers, and the Bolton analysis and the tooth size corrections were calculated by the Hamilton Arch Tooth System (HATS) software. Simple visual estimation of Bolton discrepancy was also performed. Results: In the sample group 17.4 had anterior tooth-width ratios and 5.4 had total arch ratios greater than 2 of Bolton's standard deviations from Bolton's mean. For the anterior analysis, correction greater than +/- 2 mm was required for 16 of patients in the upper arch or 9 in the lower arch. For the total arch analysis, the corresponding figures are 28 and 24. Conclusions: It is recommended that 2 mm of required tooth size correction is an appropriate threshold for clinical significance. A significant percentage of patients have a TSD of this size. Visual estimation of TSD has low sensitivity and specificity. Careful measurement is more frequently required in clinical practice than visual estimation would suggest. E.H. Angle Education and Research Foundation 2007 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/2802/1/Tooth_size_discrepancies_in_an_orthodontic_population.pdf Othman, S.A. and Harradine, N. (2007) Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population. The Angle Orthodontist, 77 (4). pp. 668-674. ISSN 0003-3219, DOI https://doi.org/10.2319/031406-102 <https://doi.org/10.2319/031406-102>. http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/031406-102 10.2319/031406-102
spellingShingle RK Dentistry
Othman, S.A.
Harradine, N.
Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
title Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
title_full Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
title_fullStr Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
title_full_unstemmed Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
title_short Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
title_sort tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population
topic RK Dentistry
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/2802/1/Tooth_size_discrepancies_in_an_orthodontic_population.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/2802/
http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/031406-102
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/