Evaluating the sustained effects of action gaming on visuospatial planning and cognitive flexibility under cognitive fatigue / Muhammad Haiqal Zianuddin ... [et al.].
This study explores the cognitive mechanisms enabling action video game players to maintain problem-solving under cognitive fatigue, addressing gaps in cognitive benefits, causal evidence, and mechanisms. A comparative analysis with non-gamers highlights differences in cognitive resilience and probl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Section |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Negeri Sembilan
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/116249/1/116249.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/116249/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study explores the cognitive mechanisms enabling action video game players to maintain problem-solving under cognitive fatigue, addressing gaps in cognitive benefits, causal evidence, and mechanisms. A comparative analysis with non-gamers highlights differences in cognitive resilience and problem-solving performance, offering insights into gaming’s potential role in enhancing cognitive function. This quasi-experimental pre- and post-test study involved 30 participants (n = 30; 18–30 years, Seremban), split into 15 gamers (n = 15; <7 hours gaming per week) and 15 non-gamers (n = 15, <1 hour gaming per week). Cognitive performance was assessed using the Tower of London task pre- and post-intervention, where several values were noted to indicate visuospatial planning and cognitive flexibility. The values noted are average moves and problem-solving time [1]. To induce cognitive fatigue, gamers performed the Stroop test for 45 minutes and non-gamers engaged in a cognitive-neutral activity by watching “NASA’s Cassini Mission” documentary, ensuring controlled intervention contrasts. Paired Sample T-test was conducted afterwards to show effect of time and to differentiate effect between groups, magnitude of mean difference was observed afterwards. Statistical significance was set at (p<0.05). |
|---|