Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model

The development of intelligent transportation systems has made traffic detection technology crucial for preventing near-miss events and enhancing road safety. You Only Look Once (YOLO), a popular target detection model, is widely used in traffic target detection. However, the performance of differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhu, Wen, Lim, Lek Ming, Majid Khan Majahar Ali, Wu, Lili, Elshahed, Amr
Format: Article
Language:en
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2025
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/26430/1/Paper_16%20-.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/26430/
https://www.ukm.my/jqma/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1855615331412738048
author Zhu, Wen
Lim, Lek Ming
Majid Khan Majahar Ali,
Wu, Lili
Elshahed, Amr
author_facet Zhu, Wen
Lim, Lek Ming
Majid Khan Majahar Ali,
Wu, Lili
Elshahed, Amr
author_sort Zhu, Wen
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description The development of intelligent transportation systems has made traffic detection technology crucial for preventing near-miss events and enhancing road safety. You Only Look Once (YOLO), a popular target detection model, is widely used in traffic target detection. However, the performance of different YOLO models varies significantly on the same quality video data. Furthermore, different video qualities affect near-miss event detection differently. This paper conducts experiments on different YOLO models using high-quality and low-quality video data to assess their detection performance. Considering the expressway scenario in this study, we use manual reporting (based on human detection), the bird’s-eye view method (based on image processing), and the distance neighbor method (based on data analysis) for near-miss detection. Results show that YOLOv5m has the highest precision, recall, and mAP@0.5 (0.990, 0.977, and 0.994) for high-quality video detection. YOLOv8m has the highest mAP@0.5 - 0.95 (0.908) for low-quality video detection. In high-quality video near-miss detection, manual reporting, the bird’s-eye view method, and the distance neighbor method show high consistency, indicating that the latter two can replace manual calculation in specific scenarios. In low-quality video near-miss detection, all three methods yield identical results, highlighting the significant impact of clarity and fluency on near-miss detection.
format Article
id my-ukm.journal.26430
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
language en
publishDate 2025
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.264302026-01-19T03:13:19Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/26430/ Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model Zhu, Wen Lim, Lek Ming Majid Khan Majahar Ali, Wu, Lili Elshahed, Amr The development of intelligent transportation systems has made traffic detection technology crucial for preventing near-miss events and enhancing road safety. You Only Look Once (YOLO), a popular target detection model, is widely used in traffic target detection. However, the performance of different YOLO models varies significantly on the same quality video data. Furthermore, different video qualities affect near-miss event detection differently. This paper conducts experiments on different YOLO models using high-quality and low-quality video data to assess their detection performance. Considering the expressway scenario in this study, we use manual reporting (based on human detection), the bird’s-eye view method (based on image processing), and the distance neighbor method (based on data analysis) for near-miss detection. Results show that YOLOv5m has the highest precision, recall, and mAP@0.5 (0.990, 0.977, and 0.994) for high-quality video detection. YOLOv8m has the highest mAP@0.5 - 0.95 (0.908) for low-quality video detection. In high-quality video near-miss detection, manual reporting, the bird’s-eye view method, and the distance neighbor method show high consistency, indicating that the latter two can replace manual calculation in specific scenarios. In low-quality video near-miss detection, all three methods yield identical results, highlighting the significant impact of clarity and fluency on near-miss detection. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2025-09 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/26430/1/Paper_16%20-.pdf Zhu, Wen and Lim, Lek Ming and Majid Khan Majahar Ali, and Wu, Lili and Elshahed, Amr (2025) Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 21 (3). pp. 247-269. ISSN 2600-8602 https://www.ukm.my/jqma/
spellingShingle Zhu, Wen
Lim, Lek Ming
Majid Khan Majahar Ali,
Wu, Lili
Elshahed, Amr
Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model
title Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model
title_full Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model
title_fullStr Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model
title_full_unstemmed Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model
title_short Object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the YOLO model
title_sort object detection and near-miss analysis in traffic videos of high and low quality based on the yolo model
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/26430/1/Paper_16%20-.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/26430/
https://www.ukm.my/jqma/
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/