Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data
When database is stored in one computer or server, certain issues related to disaster (in terms of natural or un-natural) problem may arise with reference to geographical connection and geographical distribution of servers. Here, replication feature plays an important role. There were many techniq...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2021
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19090/1/10.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19090/ https://www.ukm.my/jkukm/si-42-2021/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1834433604062543872 |
|---|---|
| author | Dildar Hussain, Mohammad Omar, Khairol Amali Ahmad, Ja’afar Adnan, Khaleel Ahmad, |
| author_facet | Dildar Hussain, Mohammad Omar, Khairol Amali Ahmad, Ja’afar Adnan, Khaleel Ahmad, |
| author_sort | Dildar Hussain, |
| building | Tun Sri Lanang Library |
| collection | Institutional Repository |
| content_provider | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| content_source | UKM Journal Article Repository |
| continent | Asia |
| country | Malaysia |
| description | When database is stored in one computer or server, certain issues related to disaster (in terms of natural or un-natural)
problem may arise with reference to geographical connection and geographical distribution of servers. Here, replication
feature plays an important role. There were many techniques and methodologies for geographically distributed servers,
but the problem was of one master. When an authorized user updates his database on a client database server then this
client database server updates his master database server and at last, the master database server updates all its client’s
database servers. The described process is called database replication. In this process, there are several main parameters
that are important, i.e., bandwidth, memory, and processor time. In this paper, the analysis is focused on comparing
which database (NoSQL family-RethinkDB and MySQL) utilize how much memory, processor, and time during replication
of database from client to master. |
| format | Article |
| id | my-ukm.journal.19090 |
| institution | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | my-ukm.journal.190902022-07-26T04:32:30Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19090/ Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data Dildar Hussain, Mohammad Omar, Khairol Amali Ahmad, Ja’afar Adnan, Khaleel Ahmad, When database is stored in one computer or server, certain issues related to disaster (in terms of natural or un-natural) problem may arise with reference to geographical connection and geographical distribution of servers. Here, replication feature plays an important role. There were many techniques and methodologies for geographically distributed servers, but the problem was of one master. When an authorized user updates his database on a client database server then this client database server updates his master database server and at last, the master database server updates all its client’s database servers. The described process is called database replication. In this process, there are several main parameters that are important, i.e., bandwidth, memory, and processor time. In this paper, the analysis is focused on comparing which database (NoSQL family-RethinkDB and MySQL) utilize how much memory, processor, and time during replication of database from client to master. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19090/1/10.pdf Dildar Hussain, and Mohammad Omar, and Khairol Amali Ahmad, and Ja’afar Adnan, and Khaleel Ahmad, (2021) Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 4 (2(SI)). pp. 65-69. ISSN 0128-0198 https://www.ukm.my/jkukm/si-42-2021/ |
| spellingShingle | Dildar Hussain, Mohammad Omar, Khairol Amali Ahmad, Ja’afar Adnan, Khaleel Ahmad, Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data |
| title | Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data |
| title_full | Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data |
| title_fullStr | Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data |
| title_full_unstemmed | Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data |
| title_short | Performance comparison between NoSQL (RethinkDB) and MySQL database replication from master to slave in big data |
| title_sort | performance comparison between nosql (rethinkdb) and mysql database replication from master to slave in big data |
| url | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19090/1/10.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19090/ https://www.ukm.my/jkukm/si-42-2021/ |
| url_provider | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/ |