Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist
John Updike, one of America’s eminent 20th century novelists, provides his own fictionalized presentation of the Muslim other within the American socio-cultural context in his 22nd novel, Terrorist. This novel is abundant with binary representations of Muslims whose acts and interactions with fell...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2018
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12886/1/21754-78291-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12886/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1096 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1834431996369043456 |
|---|---|
| author | M Ikbal M Alosman, Raihanah M. M., Ruzy Suliza Hashim, |
| author_facet | M Ikbal M Alosman, Raihanah M. M., Ruzy Suliza Hashim, |
| author_sort | M Ikbal M Alosman, |
| building | Tun Sri Lanang Library |
| collection | Institutional Repository |
| content_provider | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| content_source | UKM Journal Article Repository |
| continent | Asia |
| country | Malaysia |
| description | John Updike, one of America’s eminent 20th century novelists, provides his own fictionalized presentation of the
Muslim other within the American socio-cultural context in his 22nd novel, Terrorist. This novel is abundant
with binary representations of Muslims whose acts and interactions with fellow Christian and Jewish Americans
are scripted by their respective religious values. Updike’s exemplifications of Islam and Muslims within the
American context are investigated through the problematizing of Muslims’ socio-cultural imperfections within
the lens of orientalism and psychology of (im)perfection. Imperfectionalism as used in this paper refers to the
inconsistent, unreliable and unpredictable characteristics that define the Muslim Other in comparison to
mainstream American society. Using themes of ‘religious differences,’ ‘differences between religions,’ ‘social
differences,’ ‘gendered and exotic differences’ and ‘optimized differences,’ Updike’s Muslim characters are
presented as flawed and faulty in their beliefs and conviction. In addition, Updike’s representation of Islam
rests on its blemishes including its disregard for self-improvement and modernity. Designs of orientalism and
imperfection as seen in this novel frame the Muslim other as the imperfect version of the perfect non-Muslim
American. |
| format | Article |
| id | my-ukm.journal.12886 |
| institution | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | my-ukm.journal.128862019-05-12T21:56:38Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12886/ Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist M Ikbal M Alosman, Raihanah M. M., Ruzy Suliza Hashim, John Updike, one of America’s eminent 20th century novelists, provides his own fictionalized presentation of the Muslim other within the American socio-cultural context in his 22nd novel, Terrorist. This novel is abundant with binary representations of Muslims whose acts and interactions with fellow Christian and Jewish Americans are scripted by their respective religious values. Updike’s exemplifications of Islam and Muslims within the American context are investigated through the problematizing of Muslims’ socio-cultural imperfections within the lens of orientalism and psychology of (im)perfection. Imperfectionalism as used in this paper refers to the inconsistent, unreliable and unpredictable characteristics that define the Muslim Other in comparison to mainstream American society. Using themes of ‘religious differences,’ ‘differences between religions,’ ‘social differences,’ ‘gendered and exotic differences’ and ‘optimized differences,’ Updike’s Muslim characters are presented as flawed and faulty in their beliefs and conviction. In addition, Updike’s representation of Islam rests on its blemishes including its disregard for self-improvement and modernity. Designs of orientalism and imperfection as seen in this novel frame the Muslim other as the imperfect version of the perfect non-Muslim American. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12886/1/21754-78291-1-PB.pdf M Ikbal M Alosman, and Raihanah M. M., and Ruzy Suliza Hashim, (2018) Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 24 (2). pp. 58-70. ISSN 0128-5157 http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1096 |
| spellingShingle | M Ikbal M Alosman, Raihanah M. M., Ruzy Suliza Hashim, Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist |
| title | Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist |
| title_full | Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist |
| title_fullStr | Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist |
| title_short | Differentiation and imperfectionality in John Updike’s Terrorist |
| title_sort | differentiation and imperfectionality in john updike’s terrorist |
| url | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12886/1/21754-78291-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12886/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1096 |
| url_provider | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/ |