Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan ragam sastera Bugis
Since the 1970s, Bugis written literature has been usually classified into two categories, sureq (literature, belles lettres) and lontaraq (prose texts with a more practical orientation, often of a historiographic nature). Although most scholars accept this classification, the Bugis manuscript tr...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2007
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1107/1/Sureq%2C_Lontaraq%2C_Toloq.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1107/ http://www.ukm.my/sari/index.html |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1831353146857750528 |
|---|---|
| author | Sirtjo Koolhof, |
| author_facet | Sirtjo Koolhof, |
| author_sort | Sirtjo Koolhof, |
| building | Tun Sri Lanang Library |
| collection | Institutional Repository |
| content_provider | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| content_source | UKM Journal Article Repository |
| continent | Asia |
| country | Malaysia |
| description | Since the 1970s, Bugis written literature has been usually classified into two
categories, sureq (literature, belles lettres) and lontaraq (prose texts with a
more practical orientation, often of a historiographic nature). Although most
scholars accept this classification, the Bugis manuscript tradition does not
support this dichotomy. In this article, the use of these terms, as well as the term
toloq (usually translated as ‘heroic poem’) is analyzed based on the manuscript
tradition. This analysis finds no support for the use of these terms for literary
genres, but shows instead that they refer to manuscripts as physical objects and
that their use to classify genres of literature is artificial |
| format | Article |
| id | my-ukm.journal-1107 |
| institution | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publisher | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | my-ukm.journal-11072016-12-14T06:28:50Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1107/ Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan ragam sastera Bugis Sirtjo Koolhof, Since the 1970s, Bugis written literature has been usually classified into two categories, sureq (literature, belles lettres) and lontaraq (prose texts with a more practical orientation, often of a historiographic nature). Although most scholars accept this classification, the Bugis manuscript tradition does not support this dichotomy. In this article, the use of these terms, as well as the term toloq (usually translated as ‘heroic poem’) is analyzed based on the manuscript tradition. This analysis finds no support for the use of these terms for literary genres, but shows instead that they refer to manuscripts as physical objects and that their use to classify genres of literature is artificial Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2007 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1107/1/Sureq%2C_Lontaraq%2C_Toloq.pdf Sirtjo Koolhof, (2007) Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan ragam sastera Bugis. SARI: Jurnal Alam dan Tamadun Melayu, 25 . pp. 171-186. ISSN 0127-2721 http://www.ukm.my/sari/index.html |
| spellingShingle | Sirtjo Koolhof, Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan ragam sastera Bugis |
| title | Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan
ragam sastera Bugis |
| title_full | Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan
ragam sastera Bugis |
| title_fullStr | Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan
ragam sastera Bugis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan
ragam sastera Bugis |
| title_short | Sureq, Lontaraq, Toloq: Manuskrip dan
ragam sastera Bugis |
| title_sort | sureq, lontaraq, toloq: manuskrip dan
ragam sastera bugis |
| url | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1107/1/Sureq%2C_Lontaraq%2C_Toloq.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1107/ http://www.ukm.my/sari/index.html |
| url_provider | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/ |