An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates

In this information age, the amount of complex information available due to technological advancement would require undergraduates to be extremely competent in processing information systematically. Critical thinking ability of undergraduates has been the focal point among educators, employers and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramasamy, Shamala
Format: Monograph
Language:en
Published: ERIC 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ur.aeu.edu.my/493/1/An%20Analysis%20of%20Informal%20Reasoning%20Fallacy%20and%20Critical%20Thinking%20Dispositions%20among%20Malaysian%20Undergraduates.pdf
http://ur.aeu.edu.my/493/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1831336456458600448
author Ramasamy, Shamala
author_facet Ramasamy, Shamala
author_sort Ramasamy, Shamala
building AEU Library
collection Institutional Repository
content_provider Asia e University
content_source AEU University Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
description In this information age, the amount of complex information available due to technological advancement would require undergraduates to be extremely competent in processing information systematically. Critical thinking ability of undergraduates has been the focal point among educators, employers and the public at large. One of the dimensions of critical thinking is informal fallacy. Informal fallacy is able to distract us in thinking critically because they tend to appear as reasonable and their unreliability is not apparent on the surface. Empirical research affirms that critical thinking involves cognitive skills and dispositions. Critical thinking dispositions and informal reasoning fallacy are integral in facilitating students to have high ability in thinking critically. The aim of this paper is to measure the level of critical thinking ability among Malaysian undergraduates through the use of informal logic and critical thinking dispositions. A cross sectional survey was conducted on 189 samples of undergraduates from three different disciplines, testing them on newly developed Informal Reasoning Fallacy Instrument (IRFI) and California Critical Thinking Dispositions (CCTDI). A high reliability was achieved from both tests, with Cronbach alpha .802 for IRFI and .843 for CCTDI. Both tests projected good results among Malaysian undergraduates.
format Monograph
id my-aeu-eprints.493
institution Asia e University
language en
publishDate 2011
publisher ERIC
record_format eprints
spelling my-aeu-eprints.4932019-06-21T03:25:56Z http://ur.aeu.edu.my/493/ An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates Ramasamy, Shamala LB2300 Higher Education In this information age, the amount of complex information available due to technological advancement would require undergraduates to be extremely competent in processing information systematically. Critical thinking ability of undergraduates has been the focal point among educators, employers and the public at large. One of the dimensions of critical thinking is informal fallacy. Informal fallacy is able to distract us in thinking critically because they tend to appear as reasonable and their unreliability is not apparent on the surface. Empirical research affirms that critical thinking involves cognitive skills and dispositions. Critical thinking dispositions and informal reasoning fallacy are integral in facilitating students to have high ability in thinking critically. The aim of this paper is to measure the level of critical thinking ability among Malaysian undergraduates through the use of informal logic and critical thinking dispositions. A cross sectional survey was conducted on 189 samples of undergraduates from three different disciplines, testing them on newly developed Informal Reasoning Fallacy Instrument (IRFI) and California Critical Thinking Dispositions (CCTDI). A high reliability was achieved from both tests, with Cronbach alpha .802 for IRFI and .843 for CCTDI. Both tests projected good results among Malaysian undergraduates. ERIC 2011 Monograph NonPeerReviewed text en http://ur.aeu.edu.my/493/1/An%20Analysis%20of%20Informal%20Reasoning%20Fallacy%20and%20Critical%20Thinking%20Dispositions%20among%20Malaysian%20Undergraduates.pdf Ramasamy, Shamala (2011) An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates. Other. ERIC. ED525513
spellingShingle LB2300 Higher Education
Ramasamy, Shamala
An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates
title An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates
title_full An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates
title_fullStr An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates
title_short An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates
title_sort analysis of informal reasoning fallacy and critical thinking dispositions among malaysian undergraduates
topic LB2300 Higher Education
url http://ur.aeu.edu.my/493/1/An%20Analysis%20of%20Informal%20Reasoning%20Fallacy%20and%20Critical%20Thinking%20Dispositions%20among%20Malaysian%20Undergraduates.pdf
http://ur.aeu.edu.my/493/
url_provider http://ur.aeu.edu.my/