الحديث الشريف وموقف المستشرقين في حجته
This research discusses the attitude of the Orientalists towards the authority of the sunnah. The method used is primarily based on library research and reference to books related to the topic, includes the exposition of some of the accusations made by the Orientalists relating to the sanad and m...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Academic Projec |
| اللغة: | Abkhazian |
| منشور في: |
Kolej Universiti Islam Malaysia
2011
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/4387 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | This research discusses the attitude of the Orientalists towards the authority of the
sunnah. The method used is primarily based on library research and reference to books
related to the topic, includes the exposition of some of the accusations made by the
Orientalists relating to the sanad and matan of a hadith, as well as the counter
arguments given by the Muslim scholars to prove the authenticity of both the sanad
and matan. It is found that the sunnah is indeed the second authentic source of Islam
and all the confusions liaised by the Orientalists in it aye all baseless and meant to turn
Muslims away from its teachings. As such, the contributions of Muslim scholars in
this matter are vital to ensure the preservation of sunnah for the present and future
generations. |
|---|